Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your mouth...
This government is dying on its arse. It's sometimes said that governments have a natural lifespan, and it certainly looks like New Labour are reaching the end of theirs. It's one scandal after another at the moment, and the salad days of 1997 seem like an awfully long time ago. We have a lame duck Prime Minister and a country crying out for change.
But change to what?
David "Dave" Cameron has hardly set the world on fire, and although the Conservatives seem to be taking little steps forwards, they are hardly the government-in-waiting that Labour were in the run up to the 1997 General Election..... and it's probably kinder not to mention the Liberal Democrats as a serious political force at the moment.
So who are people going to turn to? Who do they vote for to register their disgust?
Sadly it appears that they are turning to the British National Party. At the Local Elections on Thursday, the number of BNP councillors doubled. In Barking and Dagenham they won 11 of the 13 seats they contested, and they now hold 46 in total. Given that there are something like 22,000 council seats, that may seem like small beer, but the BNP are definitely becoming more visible. Over the last couple of weeks I have heard them being discussed seriously on places like Newsnight and BBC Radio Five Live, and I can't remember seeing anything like this before on the mainstream media. They seem to be becoming newsworthy as a political party.
Lord Tebbit was even moved to write a letter to the Daily Telegraph debating whether or not the BNP were atually an extreme right-wing party (the end of the political spectrum that he holds dear) or were in fact left-wing:
"I have carefully re-read the BNP manifesto of 2005 and am unable to find evidence of Right-wing tendencies. On the other hand, there is plenty of anti-capitalism, opposition to free trade, commitments to "use all non-destructive means to reduce income inequality", to institute worker ownership, to favour workers' co-operatives, to return parts of the railways to state ownership, to nationalise the Royal National Lifeboat Institution and to withdraw from Nato. That sounds pretty Left-wing to me. Certainly the BNP poses as a patriotic party opposed to multiculturalism, and it has racist overtones, but there is no lack of patriotic Left-wing regimes; opposition to multiculturalism is now mainstream and racialism was not unknown even in the Soviet Union."
Now, Tebbit is clearly a clown. This is a party that would legalise discrimination on racial grounds. Whether they are extreme left-wing or extreme right-wing doesn't make a jot of difference.
Other policies include:
-> halt all immigration to the UK
-> abolish multiculturalism (quite how they would do this, they don't say)
-> pull British troops out of Iraq and use them to patrol Dover to keep out asylum seekers
-> introduce "firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home"
-> reintroduce National Service and to require everyone who has undergone it to keep a modern assault rifle at home. Why? "It's there to shoot burglars with if they want, it's there to shoot people who invade this country if they want, and if in the end a tyrannical government wants to usurp the rights and freedoms of the people it is there to use against the government as well,"
-> school canteens to be forced to serve one meal, and students to be forced to eat it (this will abolish anorexia, apparently)
and so on....
Rather worryingly, according to a recent poll, most Britons actually support their policies, only disowning them when they hear they are associated with the BNP. The Employment Minister Margaret Hodge actually got into a spot of hot water with her own party the other day for suggesting that voters were being "tempted" to vote for the BNP because they didn't believe that Labour was listening to their concerns:
"The political class as a whole is often frightened of engaging in the very difficult issues of race and...the BNP then exploits that and try and create out of a perception a reality which is not the reality of people's lives."
It's worth keeping in mind that people often use local elections like these to register a protest against the government of the day, and that they often cast votes for parties that they wouldn't dream of choosing in a General Election.... but the BNP definitely seem to be getting more exposure in the media than they used to, and I find this a worrying trend. Are they really becoming a viable alternative for people in this country? We're coming up to a World Cup, and I'm starting to see George Crosses hanging out of windows and attached to cars. There's a world of difference between a display of national pride like that and the desire to return to a "purer" England as voiced by the BNP... but I can't help but connect the two things in my mind somehow, and I'm worried that I won't be the only one.
Luckily for us, the average BNP politician is an idiot, and we can always hope that the more media exposure they get, the more everybody will realise this. Check out this clip of Nick Griffin, the BNP chairman, being interviewed by David Dimbleby in the wake of their local election gains. Dimbleby skewers him so effectively that I almost felt sorry for him.
Almost.
But change to what?
David "Dave" Cameron has hardly set the world on fire, and although the Conservatives seem to be taking little steps forwards, they are hardly the government-in-waiting that Labour were in the run up to the 1997 General Election..... and it's probably kinder not to mention the Liberal Democrats as a serious political force at the moment.
So who are people going to turn to? Who do they vote for to register their disgust?
Sadly it appears that they are turning to the British National Party. At the Local Elections on Thursday, the number of BNP councillors doubled. In Barking and Dagenham they won 11 of the 13 seats they contested, and they now hold 46 in total. Given that there are something like 22,000 council seats, that may seem like small beer, but the BNP are definitely becoming more visible. Over the last couple of weeks I have heard them being discussed seriously on places like Newsnight and BBC Radio Five Live, and I can't remember seeing anything like this before on the mainstream media. They seem to be becoming newsworthy as a political party.
Lord Tebbit was even moved to write a letter to the Daily Telegraph debating whether or not the BNP were atually an extreme right-wing party (the end of the political spectrum that he holds dear) or were in fact left-wing:
"I have carefully re-read the BNP manifesto of 2005 and am unable to find evidence of Right-wing tendencies. On the other hand, there is plenty of anti-capitalism, opposition to free trade, commitments to "use all non-destructive means to reduce income inequality", to institute worker ownership, to favour workers' co-operatives, to return parts of the railways to state ownership, to nationalise the Royal National Lifeboat Institution and to withdraw from Nato. That sounds pretty Left-wing to me. Certainly the BNP poses as a patriotic party opposed to multiculturalism, and it has racist overtones, but there is no lack of patriotic Left-wing regimes; opposition to multiculturalism is now mainstream and racialism was not unknown even in the Soviet Union."
Now, Tebbit is clearly a clown. This is a party that would legalise discrimination on racial grounds. Whether they are extreme left-wing or extreme right-wing doesn't make a jot of difference.
Other policies include:
-> halt all immigration to the UK
-> abolish multiculturalism (quite how they would do this, they don't say)
-> pull British troops out of Iraq and use them to patrol Dover to keep out asylum seekers
-> introduce "firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home"
-> reintroduce National Service and to require everyone who has undergone it to keep a modern assault rifle at home. Why? "It's there to shoot burglars with if they want, it's there to shoot people who invade this country if they want, and if in the end a tyrannical government wants to usurp the rights and freedoms of the people it is there to use against the government as well,"
-> school canteens to be forced to serve one meal, and students to be forced to eat it (this will abolish anorexia, apparently)
and so on....
Rather worryingly, according to a recent poll, most Britons actually support their policies, only disowning them when they hear they are associated with the BNP. The Employment Minister Margaret Hodge actually got into a spot of hot water with her own party the other day for suggesting that voters were being "tempted" to vote for the BNP because they didn't believe that Labour was listening to their concerns:
"The political class as a whole is often frightened of engaging in the very difficult issues of race and...the BNP then exploits that and try and create out of a perception a reality which is not the reality of people's lives."
It's worth keeping in mind that people often use local elections like these to register a protest against the government of the day, and that they often cast votes for parties that they wouldn't dream of choosing in a General Election.... but the BNP definitely seem to be getting more exposure in the media than they used to, and I find this a worrying trend. Are they really becoming a viable alternative for people in this country? We're coming up to a World Cup, and I'm starting to see George Crosses hanging out of windows and attached to cars. There's a world of difference between a display of national pride like that and the desire to return to a "purer" England as voiced by the BNP... but I can't help but connect the two things in my mind somehow, and I'm worried that I won't be the only one.
Luckily for us, the average BNP politician is an idiot, and we can always hope that the more media exposure they get, the more everybody will realise this. Check out this clip of Nick Griffin, the BNP chairman, being interviewed by David Dimbleby in the wake of their local election gains. Dimbleby skewers him so effectively that I almost felt sorry for him.
Almost.
12 Comments:
At 5:46 pm, Jenni said…
I have a lot of thoughts, but being that I literally just finished an exam a few moments ago, I'll just say "uh, yeah, what you said" :)
At 10:44 pm, Anonymous said…
Toni
I posted a comment on your blog about your visit to Nottingham dog racing which you might have missed. It might help you with reading of form. Have a look at my blog on dog racing if you have time. www.dog-a-roo.blogspot.com
George
At 10:59 pm, swisslet said…
thanks George. Saw your last comment and had a quick look at your blog. Next time I go down to the dog track, I'll be sure to look you up for some tips.
Any thoughts on the local elections?
ST
At 12:12 am, LB said…
it is the most uninspiring choice of political candidates and policies in living memory. No wonder no-one can be bothered to vote.
(although local elections have very little to do with general elections (he says, getting his politics voting behaviour hat on)). It's the same with by-elections - they are more often than not a protest vote against the sitting government.
who is going to win the 3.42pm at Walthamstow, then? trap 5?
At 11:07 am, Anonymous said…
Okay, who else wants to immergrate? The Federated States of Mirconesia is pleasant and has few laws to get in a mans way. I'll hire the bus.
At 12:19 pm, Monsieur Hannard said…
Ah, the neutral good alignment :)
This isn't without precedent, amigo : between the wars there was a similar slight increase in public support of far-right parties, but it was short-llived.
In fact, if you glance back in history, about every 50 years or so it happens that the various 'pendulums' (or should that be pendula? lol) reach the ends of their swings, at which point extreme political parties get a foot-hold. Then the pendulums start to swing back again and their gains dissipate ; normality is restored.
All the way back to the medieval massacres of the Jews in England (BNP?) and Wat Tyler (Communists?) - and beyond !
But it's also a tendency of people to believe that the times they're currently living in are the worst ever. Largely due I think, to people only looking back as far as (their) 'living memory' goes... But it's funny how those same people, when they get older, tend to look back and believe they lived through a now-vanished golden age! :)
Plus ça change, etc., innit. By the way, your partner may appreciate "Tintin in Irak" - see link on my blog.
At 12:47 pm, Kaptain Kobold said…
"-> school canteens to be forced to serve one meal, and students to be forced to eat it (this will abolish anorexia, apparently)"
Really? And here's me thinking that it's to make life difficult for people with religious-based dietery restrictions and (I suspect) vegetarians (who are all multicultural lefties, don't you know).
At 12:49 pm, Kaptain Kobold said…
"-> introduce "firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home""
There's a blond hair and blue eye tendency in our family which suggests that we may be descended from 8th-11th century Viking immigrants. Will I get an incentive to go and live in Scandinavia?
At 2:15 pm, swisslet said…
Alan - check out the clip. Dimbleby picks him up on vegetarians etc & Griffin is forced to accept that "obviously" vegetarians would be offered a choice, but halal meat would be banned as a barbaric practice (does he know what it is?)
I love the fact that he thinks forcing people to eat will cure bulimia! Simple when you think about it, eh?
ST
At 2:47 pm, old enough to moan said…
Unfortunately Labour shot itself in the foot with bad publicity before the local elections and a poor advertising campaign. The BNP will eventually shot itself in the foot before too many people for into the trap of voting for them in a general election.
Other than voting Green the alternative has to be a Labour Party pitched somewhere between the Old and the New.
However, the Labour Party needs to dump Mr. Blair pretty soon and have a fair, contested leadership race. Mr. Brown, despite the alleged differences between he and Blair, has associated himself with not only with the Iraq war but also with the policies on the HNS and Schools.
At 6:21 pm, Stef said…
There was a nice piece in The Observer today about how earth-shatteringly incompetent BNP part councillors have been up to date.
"Whenever the BNP gets into power, its councillors make the Home Office appear a model of administrative efficiency. In Burnley, one resigned after smashing a bottle into the face of another BNP member. A second left because he didn't have a clue about local government - 'There's meetings that go right over my head and there's little point in me being there,' the poor dear complained. In Stoke-on-Trent, the city's first BNP councillor spoke only twice during two years in office (and one of his 'speeches' was an interruption to ask what 'abstain' meant)."
People are voting BNP because they don't trust the Tories or Labour at the moment, it'll soon pass when people realise that the BNP are even less competent than them. I hope!
At 2:35 am, Del said…
I absolutely agree with your concern, but I think this is a blip. The British people are always notoriously sceptical of any political leaders who come along and promise them the world via extremism, which is why we've never had an extreme left or right wing government. And if you compare the negligible share of the vote the racists got here compared to similar parties on the continent, we have little to fear.
The key of course is to talk up just what they represent in reality. People are always moaning about "x race" or "y religion", but if you said "well, that's gonna mean your friends a, b and c being sent back to another country, and the rest of the world shunning us" they might react somewhat differently. It easy to talk in abstract generalities, but in this country almost everyone gets on just fine.
Post a Comment
<< Home