52% intelligent. 9% modest. More monkey than bear.

Friday, March 03, 2006

are you just cool, but I'm just fake?

James Blunt @ Nottingham Arena, 3rd March 2006

The first time I saw James Blunt on TV was actually his first ever live TV appearance, on Later...with Jools Holland. It was just him and his piano. He played "Goodbye My Lover" and was clearly extremely nervous. I thought he was terrible, to be honest. Over the next few days though, I found that I couldn't get the song out of my mind. This, coupled with a bit of TV advertising, was enough to send me out to buy the album, just as it was being re-released (having made little impact the first time around). I thought the album was ok. "You're Beautiful" and "Goodbye My Lover" were the clear standout tracks for me, but I thought that the rest of it wasn't bad, and there didn't seem to be any stinkers. I saw his was on the Glastonbury bill, and decided he was worth a look live.

Glastonbury took place just as "You're Beautiful" was starting to make an impression on the top end of the chart, but before it had climbed all the way up to the top. Because he wasn't a big act, Blunt's slot was at midday on the Sunday. It was a sunny day, and it soon became clear that word was getting out, and through the course of the set, a massive crowd gathered around the Pyramid Stage. Blunt himself has said that this was the moment when he knew that things were beginning to happen for him.

Bazillions of album sales later, Blunt finds himself in a fairly happy place. He has had a number one single and number one album in the UK (the album knocked Coldplay's "X&Y" off the top slot). He won two Brit awards the other week, and when he played the last notes in the Nottingham Arena this evening, he had just completed a sell out UK Arena tour. He also will have learned this week that "You're Beautiful" has just gone to number one in the US Billboard Chart.

Not a bad year.

So of course, there is a backlash in full swing, and plenty of people will tell you how much they hate him. Why do they hate him so much? Probably partly because of his posh army background (he was an officer in the Household Cavalry, and as well as leading an armoured column in Kosovo, he has guarded members of the Royal Family). In a world in which most English musicians are keen to emphasise their working class roots, Blunt also has an unbelievably plummy accent. It's not so much that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, more that he has the whole cutlery set. He has a fairly mannered singing style too, which probably grates a little if you're looking for reasons not to like him. And, of course, he's sold a lot of records to a lot of different people. There's nothing like massive popularity to put people off an artist. It's hard to look cool in your James Blunt t-shirt when you know your mum has a copy of the CD in her car, and your granny thinks he's a nice boy.

The audience at the gig this evening was probably a case in point: loads of kids, loads of couples and quite a few older people. A real mixed bag. We arrived at about 20:30 in time to catch the last song by the support act, and I wasn't really very surprised to see that the Arena was pretty full. The tickets said that doors opened at 18:30. You and I know that the main act won't be onstage before probably 21:30, especially if he has only released a single album's worth of material. Lots of other people will have insisted on being there before 19:00 so they didn't miss anything. There was a real hum of excitement too, not the kind of jaded nonchalance that you often get at cooler gigs at smaller venues, but the kind of feeling that lots of people were really looking forward to their friday night out at the arena. Actually it made something of a refreshing change, and it was nice to see an unknown (to me anyway) support act getting a really rapturous send off.

Blunt came on... and he was pretty good. He's clearly a much more confident performer now than he was at Glastonbury, but the set is more or less the same, with one or two new songs thrown into the mixer. "Goodbye My Lover" was a genuinely emotionally charged moment though: just Blunt at his piano underneath a spotlight, singing this passionate song to an enraptured crowd waving the gentle phosphorescent glow of their mobile phones at him. Ah, it would have been perfect....if only the stupid cow sitting behind me hadn't taken it into her head to start trying to have a conversation with the person who she was connected to:

"Can you hear it? CAN YOU HEAR IT? You enjoying it? YOU ENJOYING IT? yeah? YEAH?"

Argghhhhhhhhhh. It was all I could do not to make a grab for her phone and either hurl it across the room, or stick it somewhere it wouldn't be so bothersome.... for me anyway. Every song she recognised, she was on the bloody phone. Jesus.

....and relax.

The best song Blunt played all night wasn't actually one of his.... he's been doing a cover of the Pixies song "Where Is My Mind?" for a while now, and he played a stonking version of it tonight. To be honest, it made me want to go and see The Pixies, but he does a decent enough version of it.

And then he played "You're Beautiful" (unbelievably people were leaving - isn't this song most of the point of going to see James Blunt live?). I don't care what you think of this song really, you have to respect the power that it has over people. 20,000 people shared a moment as Blunt played this, and it was quite a thing to see. It's one of those songs, like "Angels", that just seems to reach out to people, and they get totally wrapped up in it. I won't say it was magical, but it was really very impressive.

Hats off to the guy, I say. He's not the greatest artist I've ever seen, but he's quite a long way from being the worst. Hate him if you want, but don't expect him to care. The Force is very much with him at the moment..... why can't we just celebrate the fact that a British singer-songwriter is being so bizarrely and unexpectedly successful worldwide? Why do we have to throw stones at him because he has escaped the indie ghetto? Far better this than Westlife, I say.

He's off to America now - presumably sent by the record company to cash in on his chart success. You don't stand a chance. You'll hear his accent and the country will be his for the taking.



  • At 5:55 am, Blogger Aravis said…

    Yes well, an accent does make up for a multitude of sins. *G* Perhaps I'll have to take a moment to listen to him and make up my own mind. :0)

  • At 6:18 am, Blogger Alecya G said…

    If you like it, like it. Nothing wrong with that.

    Anyone *anyone* who has a cell phone conversation at a concert needs to be bludgeoned to peices with their phone. Simple as that.

  • At 7:01 am, Blogger Me said…

    It's interesting you should say that thing about Westlife. I've only ever heard two Blunt songs (but I've heard both of them lots of times). Ella likes him. I said to her that his songs sound like Westlife songs to me. Particularly the predictability of the lyrics in the chorus of "You're Beautiful".

    Having said that, I now fear a lynching.

  • At 9:39 am, Blogger Stef said…

    You're right about there being a backlash, we do so seem to hate a success.

    However, I would like to point out that I thought 'beautiful' was bollocks when I first heard it and my opinion hasn't changed. I've never really liked that style of music finding it insipid and dull. That's just me though.

  • At 10:43 am, Blogger swisslet said…

    everyone makes a huge deal about Jeff Buckley. Granted, he had a fabulous singing voice, but I want someone to put forward a cogent reason as to why he's "better" than James Blunt. He sold less records and he's dead, so therefore he is held up as a great lost genius.

    I'm not saying I think that Blunt is a more significant artist, or even that I prefer him (I don't, I just think Buckley is overrated). I just want to hear someone try to explain it.


    (I will say though - Blunt's use of the word "subway" in "You're Beautiful" really struck me last night. It's not a term an Englishman would readily use for the Underground, and it made me wonder how much influence people like Linda Perry had on the writing process. Or it could be he wrote it when he was in the USA.....)

  • At 11:24 am, Blogger Me said…

    I've only got Grace by Buckley, but I've never got tired of listening to it. As I say, I only know two Blunt songs so I'm not exactly an expert on him. I would say, though, that both Blunt's songs sounded very similar to each other, whereas Buckley is much more varied. Also, Buckley's music has dynamics, whereas the two Blunt songs I've heard... er... don't have dynamics, or any noticeable ones. Finally, Blunt's melodies are very predictable and therefore stop being interesting after a few listens... for me, anyway. I like a chorus to soar. Buckley is less immediate, I think, but his melodies are growers.

    Not very convincing, is it?

    Anyway, I'll probably like Blunt in a few months. I hated Ash when I first heard "Girl From Mars". How wrong was I about them?

  • At 11:44 pm, Blogger Sarah said…

    I was mostly struck by how little charisma the guy has when I saw him in Wolverhampton on Wednesday (in my defence I'd forgotten that I ever agreed to going along - the tickets were purchased a very long time ago).

    Well, when I say 'struck' - I would have been if I hadn't been halfway to a coma myself.... (perhaps it was just the jet lag)

    (apropos of nothing - a topical word verification if you keep up with Lord Bargain 'fucxz'.

  • At 12:30 am, Blogger Ali said…

    I'm just going to show my prejudices here to express the difference in my opinion.

    When I listen to Grace, it makes me feel as though I am having a cross between an asthma attack and a religious epiphany. When I heard that Jeff Buckley had died I broke down and cried.

    James Blunt's music has no such effect on me, and I find him an unbearable twit, and it has nothing to do with whether he is posh or was in the army. I thought he was a twit before all else.

    But as you say - fair play him etc.

  • At 9:52 am, Blogger Hyde said…

    Jeff Buckley's "Hallelujah"= God... Or at least sex. It depends on what you have the patience for...


  • At 10:26 pm, Blogger swisslet said…


    Jeff Buckley had a wonderful voice - far better than Blunt's.... but I have to say I didn't think he was the genius that he is often painted as since his death. I saw him live once. He was on the "Melody Maker" stage at Reading in 1994. I was there to see Gene (!), but got there early and caught this guy with the amzing voice. It's a shame he didn't live long enough to find the material worthy of his voice.

    I'm with Hyde in that his version of "Hallelujah" is absolutely divine though. Remember it's a cover though. Buckley sings it beautifully (and it's my favourite version of the song), but at least some of the credit has to go to Leonard Cohen. Blunt at least writes most of his own material.

    I'm not being snobby about artists who don't write their own material, I'm just saying.


  • At 10:10 am, Blogger Ben said…

    Swiss, you have sunk - nay, plummetted - in my estimation. ;)

    Blunt would be the answer to the insomniac's prayer, were it not for that fuckawful voice. Passionless, spineless, witless cack.

    An excruciatingly nice chap, according to a friend who interviewed him immediately prior to the Glastonbury set - but so fucking dull.

    Liked your comment about cutlery!

    Never "got" Jeff Buckley either, though - one of my "blind spots".

  • At 10:37 am, Blogger swisslet said…

    I don't want to sound like I'm backing off here, but I want to be clear: I do not think James Blunt is a genius. I'm just saying I don't think he deserves a lot of the abuse that he's been getting. The album is okay. I'm a bit bemused why it's sold so many copies, but better him than G4.

    The point of the Jeff Buckley comparison is simply to try to force people who are condemning Blunt to come up with a coherent reason why they don't like him. It's fine not to like him, it just pisses me off that some artists are uncritically adored, and other artists are just slated.... based on what is deemed "cool". Buckely is one of those people who is generally held up as "a genius", when although he was talented, I wouldn't go that far. From what I can see, the reverse is true about Blunt. He's not a genius by any stretch of the imagination, but he's not terrible either.

    I've been to "cooler" gigs that were a lot worse, let me tell you. Bob Dylan at the London Arena and Lou Reed at the Albert Hall for starters.


  • At 12:31 pm, Blogger Flash said…

    James Blunt? Not for me mate. There are many folk who do the whole solo singer thing so much better; David Ford & Ed Harcourt to name a couple.

  • At 10:27 pm, Blogger Jenni said…

    erm...never heard of him. Does that mean I am woefully out of touch or that the Midwestern American music scene just hasn't really caught on yet?

  • At 2:35 am, Blogger Mark said…

    John Cale's version of Hallelujah is the nuts.

    James Blunt is a fluffyheaded gimp.


Post a Comment

<< Home